Interesting to consider and study the semiotics of desire. http://ow.ly/Gmuu30aD1pm
Example of China getting to grips with global brand-naming – a lesson for us all dealing with intercultural branding http://ow.ly/gM9Q309XAtx
We have seen a number of brands suffering reputational damage over recent years – BP, VW, Sports Direct, BHS – to name just four that spring readily to mind.
By comparison, the glitch at the Oscars is just an amusing sideshow. However, it brings into sharp focus the importance of attention to detail in everything a brand does. The bigger the brand the more small details matter.
Brands are about people – not only the people in the organisation, but the people with whom they interact. The brand exists at this nexus of interaction. The right brand values are shared throughout the organisation, so every point of interaction should reflect those values. That should include attention to detail in servicing customers and dealing with the world in general.
Mistakes happen, people are human. But often particular brands are chosen because among their perceived values are reliability and being a safe pair of hands. The brand has a reputation which has a tangible value.
For such brands, damage to that reputation can be costly.
Every brand loves to be involved in high profile projects as they have the potential for exposure and building that valuable reputation. However there is the very real danger of those human slips and errors, should they occur, happening in full public glare.
One Marketing Ltd give our clients what they ask for. It’s what marketing is all about – and they want web development.
We are a broad-based consultancy with a focus on brand based marketing communications. However, thanks to our history in web-development, we are regularly referred by past clients to help new ones with site design, creation and management.
Check out the link for more info.
When personal brands mean money – lots of money! http://ow.ly/MRGc303oOzz
We need to get real psychologists back working in marketing, not ‘pop-psychology’ #peoplemakebrands http://ow.ly/uffu303hjNK
Brands are about perceptions rather than reality, because they are primarily concerned with emotion more than logic.
Perceptions and attributions may be constructed from early experiences of a brand or by received information. Often, that information is also emotionally constructed. It may have been channelled through peer groups, respected friends or colleagues, or sympathetic media.
Large brands may spend a great deal of resource trying to understand perceptions in the hope of being able to correct any gaps between perception and ‘reality’. Modifying such perception gaps may be a near impossible task as attributions people have constructed themselves are often not accessible to logical argument – they may require significant rebuilding of the brand’s emotional capital.
Changing perceptions can be a long and difficult process – often outside the scope of small brands.
All may not be as it seems.
A key word however is ‘understanding’. Perceptions do not always have to be changed, but they must be understood.
One of the most important perception gaps for small and medium enterprises is that between internal and external perceptions.
Smaller businesses tend to be driven by small close-knit teams with a shared vision of what their business is all about. They are very close to their product or service and have a deep understanding of its operation. However, there may be a significant gap between that and the benefits customers perceive in dealing with the organisation.
The company may believe its key strength lies in the range of products and services – customers may put quality of service top of their list.
A business may see its pricing as a vital advantage – for clients it may be same-day delivery.
Customers may relate to the image of a charismatic CEO while the business believes they success depends upon innovative solutions.
It’s easy to see that this perception gap can lead to businesses devoting costly resource on developing and promoting the wrong dimensions of their brand. Conversely, identifying and building on strengths as perceived by clients can be an effective and rewarding action.
Dealing with the gap
So, how do we identify the perception gap? The answer is relatively simple.
First clarify within the organisation what is seen as the major brand strengths and reasons why clients should make their choices.
Next determine what are the strengths as perceived by customers and other stakeholders. How do we do that? Simple – just ask them – surprisingly, people will usually just tell you.
A very simple device is the customer service survey. Ask questions designed to probe people’s views of the company and services. These could include a list of adjectives with the question: ‘Whch of these best describes ABC?’ Similarly, a list of benefits – price, range, customer service, reliability, track record etc. – asking the client to rank them in order of importance.
Ask a range of questions and keep as many as possible quantitative – i.e. score 1 – 10 or rank these qualities. This allows you to measure answers from a number of respondents. Eep the qualitative questions, ‘What do you think…’ To a minimum.
Your last task is to compare the customers’ perception with the company’s. There may be some obvious gaps that need addressing or some small adjustments. Remember, it’s more effective and easier to adjust your brand communications to be in tune with customer perceptions.
Thought provoking – though brands are not necessarily about innovation. http://ow.ly/IBd5302SJf9
When a brand gets personal – interesting perspective from ‘across the pond’. http://ow.ly/29cR302uZGn